Posts Tagged ‘ Supreme Court ’

political scientism | codes? we don’t need no stinking codes

August 5, 2010
By
political scientism | codes? we don’t need no stinking codes

Are you ready? Well, are you? Are you ready to get boring? If you stick with me, I promise a paradox at the end. (Check out David Cohen’s post at SCOTUSblog to drink the genius water straight from the fire hose.) To get truly boring, we need to go back in time to the 18th century. To get a sense of how long ago that was, consider top hats.  Back then, wearing a top hat didn’t just say, as it does now, that, “I am partial to smoking opiates.” Rather, public hygiene being what it was at the time, wearing a top hat conveyed the impression that, “I never know when I will be walking on a sidewalk when someone might decide to empty a bucket of feces from a second floor window.” So, if you think South Carolina is bad now, you should have seen it back then. The genius of the Constitution was that it promised a bunch of unruly, rag-tag colonies a way to band together for limited purposes like establishing an army, regulating trade between the states and, of course, requiring frivolous abortions at taxpayer expense. The Constitution is the rulebook for the federal government, not

Read more »

in my secret court

July 21, 2010
By
in my secret court

A vital part of any exclusive club – from Opus Dei to the Harvard Lampoon — is a robust fetish for secrecy. The United States Supreme Court isn’t any different. You can watch your local school board deliberate on cable access; you can watch British Parliament go at each other’s throats on C-SPAN; and if you live in Florida, among other states, you can even watch your State Supreme Court deliberate (read: bicker) on the Internet. Nonetheless, if you want to watch an oral argument before the United States Supreme Court but don’t live in Washington, D.C. — and for your sake, I hope you don’t — the best you can do is wait for the audio recording to be released, then listen to it while looking at photographs of the Justices. Which is not to say that the idea of videotaping Supreme Court proceedings hasn’t ever been considered. And in response to that suggestion, Justice David Souter famously declared that he’d welcome cameras in the courtroom … on the condition that they roll them in over his dead body. This stance in favor of opacity and against cameras shouldn’t surprise us. The culture of secrecy emanates from a group of

Read more »